1. Problem Statement: Why “Best Team” ≠ Best ROI
Parents are asked to spend $3,000–$10,000+ per year on youth soccer without any neutral way to judge:
- Is MLS NEXT actually worth the drive and the cost?
- Is ECNL “as good” or “worse” for my kid’s goals?
- Is a USL academy a real pathway or a nice badge?
- Is our local club enough, or are we falling behind?
The market sells prestige and exposure. You need a way to measure return on investment (ROI) in terms of:
- Development – Is my kid getting better, faster?
- Opportunity – Are doors opening (pro, college, national team)?
- Sustainability – Are we burning money/time or building a healthy, long-term pathway?
2. Define “ROI” in Youth Soccer (So You Don’t Get Manipulated)
For this framework, think of ROI as:
Player Outcomes per Unit of Family Cost
Where:
Player Outcomes =
- Technical/tactical growth
- Level of competition & minutes
- Opportunities (pro, college, USYNT)
- Enjoyment & longevity in the game
Family Cost =
- Direct money (fees, travel, extras)
- Time (driving, missed school, family strain)
- Emotional cost (pressure, burnout, constant anxiety about “exposure”)
Your job as a parent:
Maximize real outcomes per dollar and hour spent, not badges or Instagram posts.
3. Step-By-Step Process Breakdown
Step 1 – Be Honest About Your Child’s Current Track
Put your child in one of three buckets (you can adjust later):
- Pro-Track (Top ~1–3%)
- Dominates locally/regionally at their age.
- Coaches outside your club talk about them unprompted.
- Already getting looks from MLS NEXT / USL / USYNT / top college ID events.
- Obsessed with the game without parents pushing.
- Serious College-Track
- One of the better players in a solid regional team.
- Strong work habits, loves training.
- Physically/technically competitive for their age.
- Reasonable chance at D1/D2/D3/NAIA if development continues.
- Competitive / Lifestyle Player
- Loves playing, wants good coaching and competition.
- College or pro is a “nice-to-have,” not the primary driver.
- Social and enjoyment value are high.
Your ROI decisions should be completely different across these three.
Step 2 – Set Your Family Budget & Constraints
Answer these three questions in writing:
- Money:
- ☐ We can spend <$2,000/year
- ☐ We can spend $2,000–$5,000/year
- ☐ We can stretch to $5,000–$10,000+/year only if value is clear
- Travel / Time Appetite:
- Max weekly drive time (one way): 30 / 60 / 90+ minutes?
- How many out-of-state trips per year are realistic? (0 / 1–3 / 4+)
- Risk Tolerance for “Betting on Soccer”
- Are we okay sacrificing other activities, school flexibility, and vacations to chase a pathway?
- Or do we want balance first, soccer second?
This matters because MLS NEXT 90 minutes away might be “great” in theory but terrible ROI for your actual family.
Step 3 – Use a Simple Scorecard for Any Option
For each pathway (MLS NEXT, ECNL, USL, local travel, local rec), score 1–5 on each of these:
- Development Quality
- Coaching licenses don’t matter as much as:
- Session intensity
- Individual feedback
- Training-to-game ratio
- 1 = chaotic, low reps, lots of scrimmage; 5 = clear curriculum, high tempo, real progression.
- Coaching licenses don’t matter as much as:
- Competitive Level & Minutes
- 1 = poor competition or your kid never plays.
- 5 = strong competition and your kid plays meaningful minutes.
- Pathway Clarity
- 1 = vague promises, no clear track record.
- 5 = clear, documented pipeline (e.g., X players to MLS/USL/college in last 3–5 years).
- Visibility / Exposure (Real, Not Hype)
- 1 = almost no tournaments, no one watches games who can actually do something for your kid.
- 5 = regular events and leagues where real scouts/college coaches are known to attend.
- Bonus: Is game film easy to access and share (Hudl, Veo, etc.)?
- Cost Load (Reverse Scored)
- 1 = very expensive + heavy travel.
- 5 = low fees, local, or heavily subsidized.
- Wellbeing & Fit
- 1 = toxic culture, constant stress, child dreads training.
- 5 = demanding but healthy, child is energized, environment is supportive.
You could literally average scores or just circle strengths and weaknesses. The key is forcing yourself to see tradeoffs.
4. Pathway-Specific Realities: How to Think About Each Option
Below is not “which is best,” but how to evaluate ROI pathway by pathway.
A. MLS NEXT (MLS Club Academy – Fully or Mostly Free)
Typical reality:
- Cost:
- Club fees: usually $0 at MLS academies; some travel support.
- Hidden cost: time, commuting, potential private schooling or relocation.
- Media/Exposure:
- Strong: MLS NEXT is monitored by MLS, USL, USYNT, and foreign scouts.
- Games increasingly filmed; Apple/MLS ecosystem boosts narrative over time.
When ROI is high:
- Your kid is clearly top-tier in their age group and not just “barely making the roster.”
- Travel is manageable (or you’re willing to reorganize life around it).
- The club has a track record of playing teenagers (via MLS NEXT Pro and first team).
Red flags:
- They carry huge rosters, your kid rarely starts or plays full halves.
- You’re driving 60–90+ minutes each way and your child is exhausted or falling behind in school.
- The academy rarely promotes to the first team; most “graduates” just drop to college without pro minutes.
Parent ROI lens:
For true pro-track kids, this is usually the highest ROI in the country if it’s accessible and your child is truly competing. For college-only or “maybe” players, the life cost may outweigh the benefit versus a top ECNL/local situation.
B. MLS NEXT (Non-MLS / Pay-to-Play Clubs)
Typical reality:
- Cost:
- Higher fees (often $3,000–$6,000+ per year) plus travel.
- Media/Exposure:
- MLS NEXT “badge” boosts perception, but pro pathway is less direct than true MLS academies.
When ROI is high:
- Local option with strong coaching and real player movement into MLS academies, USL, or top colleges.
- Your kid plays major minutes and is among the best on the team.
Red flags:
- The club leans hard on the brand but cannot show recent, concrete outcomes beyond “we go to big showcases.”
- Limited communication about individual development plans.
Parent ROI lens:
Treat this like high-end ECNL with a different label. ROI depends on coaching quality and placement record, not the logo alone.
C. ECNL (Boys & Girls) / GA (Girls)
Typical reality:
- Cost:
- Often $3,000–$6,000+ with multiple flight tournaments/showcases.
- Media/Exposure:
- Very strong for college recruiting; lighter direct pathway to pro compared to MLS academies, but plenty of pros come through these environments.
When ROI is high:
- Your primary outcome is college soccer (especially strong for girls).
- Your kid is starting and influential on a competitive ECNL/GA team.
- The club has clear data: how many players per class go to which levels of college.
Red flags:
- Huge spend on “exposure” tournaments with little feedback from colleges.
- Multiple ID camps and showcases stacked on top of each other with no clear targeting (e.g., random D3 camp for a D1-level player, or vice versa).
Parent ROI lens:
For college-track players with decent budget, ECNL/GA can be very good ROI, especially if it reduces the need for random ID camps. For pro-track players, you’ll want to see clear evidence of pro opportunities or an eventual move into a pro environment.
D. USL Academies
Typical reality:
- Cost:
- Varies; some are low-fee or subsidized, others closer to normal club fees.
- Media/Exposure:
- Less mainstream than MLS, but direct line to USL first teams, which increasingly sell to MLS and abroad.
When ROI is high:
- Your kid is pro-track but doesn’t have MLS access regionally.
- Club has proven it will play teenagers and/or move them on (USL → MLS/Europe).
- Travel footprint is more local than national MLS NEXT events.
Red flags:
- Academy mostly exists as a brand extension, with little actual promotion to first team.
- No track record of player movement beyond local colleges.
Parent ROI lens:
USL academies can be sneaky-high ROI for pro-track kids in the right markets—especially where MLS options are limited. For college-only pathways, treat them similar to a strong regional club with better branding.
E. Local Competitive/Travel Clubs (Non-ECNL/Non-MLS/Non-USL)
Typical reality:
- Cost:
- Wide range, but often $1,500–$3,500+ per year plus some travel.
- Media/Exposure:
- Limited beyond local college coaches and occasional tournaments. Most “exposure” is self-made via video.
When ROI is high:
- Coaching quality is genuinely good (often a hidden gem coach).
- You prioritize development, minutes, and balance over brand.
- You’re proactive about film, email outreach, and targeted ID camps as college age approaches.
Red flags:
- Club constantly sells “exposure” without placing players at meaningful levels.
- Training sessions are slow, low-intensity, focused on winning weekend games rather than individual growth.
Parent ROI lens:
For serious college or lifestyle players, a strong local club can be excellent ROI if it keeps costs and travel lower while delivering good development and minutes. You’ll just need to be more active on the media/exposure side (film, outreach, smart showcases).
F. Local Rec / Grassroots
Typical reality:
- Cost:
- Lowest; often a few hundred dollars per season.
- Media/Exposure:
- None. This is development and fun, not a scouting platform.
When ROI is high:
- Ages U6–U11, when the main priority is touches on the ball and joy.
- Families that value multi-sport participation and flexibility.
Parent ROI lens:
Best ROI for young ages and non-elite ambitions. For kids trending toward pro-or-college track, you’ll eventually want a stronger training environment by ~U12–U14.
5. Putting It Together: A Simple ROI Decision Grid
Use this as a rule-of-thumb:
If your kid is Pro-Track and you have moderate/high resources:
- Priority:
- True MLS academy (free) or strong USL academy.
- High-end MLS NEXT / ECNL where they are a top player, not a bench name.
- ROI filter:
- Minutes > Badge.
- Track record of teenage pro minutes is non-negotiable.
If your kid is Serious College-Track with middle-class budget:
- Priority:
- Strong ECNL/GA or equivalent regional power club.
- High-quality local competitive club + smart exposure strategy (film + targeted ID events).
- ROI filter:
- Look at the last 3 classes: where did players actually commit, at what levels?
If your kid is Competitive / Lifestyle:
- Priority:
- Strong local club with good coaching, less travel, sane schedule.
- ROI filter:
-
Does your kid love going to training? Are they improving without the family being financially wrecked?
-
6. Actionable Next Steps for Parents
You can literally do this this week:
- Fill out a one-page ROI sheet for your current club:
- Score 1–5 on the six categories:
- Development, Competition/Minutes, Pathway Clarity, Exposure, Cost, Wellbeing.
- Write your child’s track: Pro / College / Competitive.
- Score 1–5 on the six categories:
- Ask each club 5 non-negotiable questions:
- In the last 3–5 years, how many players did you place and where? (Pro/USL/MLS/college and what levels.)
- Who are your top 3 current alumni, and where are they playing?
- How do you handle playing time decisions at U15+?
- How many training sessions per week, and what’s the training-to-game ratio?
- What film and exposure support do you provide for college or pro interest?
- Audit your annual spend vs outcomes:
- Add: fees + travel + extra training + ID camps for last 12 months.
- Ask: “What tangible outcome did we get? Skill growth? Level jump? Concrete interest from colleges or pro clubs?”
- If the answer is mostly memories and mileage, consider downgrading cost and upgrading development quality closer to home.
- Plan the next 18 months, not the next weekend:
- For a Pro-Track kid: map which environments and leagues they need to be in by U15, U17, U19.
- For a College-Track kid: map when to start:
- Filming games regularly.
- Emailing colleges.
- Attending 1–2 targeted ID events per year (not 10 random ones).
- Watch your child’s energy as your true KPI:
- ROI dies when the kid is burnt out or resentful.
- If the pathway is technically “elite” but your kid loses joy and confidence, the return is negative—no matter the logo.
Tags
